camper trailers tech tips

Supercheap 42 litre fridge mods

 

 

 

 

Supercheap 42 litre compressor fridge/freezer

LianFa LF8042

 



 brackground     

    Some testing and experimenting has been done to see if there was any way of improving the efficiency of the fridge without making any major modifications. The restriction of no major modification to the fridge prevented some avenues from being investigated further.

 

test ennironment

      The testing was done with the fridge set to 0 degrees, approx 80% full of drinks and inside a habitable room. The room temperature was not controlled and impacted on absolute results however adjacent testing ( ie tests either side of each other ) would not have had any significant changes in environment so should be indicative for comparison purposes. The duty cycle was measured by utilising a data logger sensing the load current with a sample period of 10 seconds. Results were monitored until 3 successive results were stabilised and then recorded.

 

observations/ modifications     

      1. The DC plug and cable were changed to utilise a standard ‘ARRID’ style plug. This is very similar to the supplied plug/ socket combination however it required that the DC socket on the fridge be replaced as the diameter of the socket was fractionally smaller than the more common ARRID plug and it wouldn’t fit.

      2. Testing was then done to see if the ‘off’ time of the fridge could be increased.

      The compressor unit was identified as a significant heat source near the fridge compartment. Various forms of insulation were tried to see if they impacted on the ‘off’ time for the fridge. No significant improvements were found however the insulation does effect the cooling ( or ‘on’ time ). See the test data. The material used is similar to ‘bubble wrap’ packaging material with a foil skin on the outsides. It was chosen as being readily available and flexible enough to be manipulated into place.

      3. What may be worth investigating is if the insulation is acting as insulation or as an air baffle.

      4. Experimentation with the fan placement and number of fans produced some significant improvements in the duty cycle of the compressor. The original fan is located in the approximate centre of the motor compartment, blowing air horizontally from the middle of the compartment through the condenser.

      The problem with this location is that the hot air from the compressor, directly below the fan, is blown through the condenser. By relocating the fan so that cooler outside air is first blown over the condenser the efficiency of the fridge is dramatically improved. As an indication the standard fridge, as tested, had a duty cycle of ~59%, ( Test 1 ). With insulation and the relocated fan the duty cycle is ~39% ( Test 6 ). The on time has been reduced by nearly 50%.

      5. The fan location was not particularly critical however the proximity of the fan intake to the outside casing was critical. Initial testing was done by relocating the original fan to within 10-15mm of the outside of the compressor compartment, then a flexible air baffle was added to seal the fan intake to the outside of the compartment. The compressor run times improved from ~233 Seconds ( Test 4 ) to ~203 Seconds ( Test 5 ).
Results with a fan on the side or on the top of the compartment made minimal difference to the duty cycle.

      6. The final fan location was on the side of the compartment and fixed to the outside of the case ie no air gap between the fan intake and the outside.

      7. The modifications were undertaken to have minimal impact on the fridge to allow for easy removal and restoration of the original configuration. As a result the air intake for the fan Is not optimal. A significant amount of fan noise is produced because of the restrictions to the inlet causing the air to be sucked in the existing ventilation slits. And some mechanical vibrating noise as a result of the fan being mounted onto the case.

      8. Some experimentation was done with a 50degC thermal switch (mounted onto the compressor) to switch the fans on/off. This appeared to have a slight detrimental effect on the duty cycle.

      9. Further investigation into switching the fan on/off with the compressor would be warranted if only to reduce the noise and current consumption.

 

test results

Test 1

Standard

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

323

320

320

330

Off time (sec)

223

220

230

220

Duty Cycle

59%

 

 

 

 

 Test 2

With insulation only, no fans at all

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

323

310

340

320

Off time (sec)

187

190

180

190

Duty Cycle

63%

 

 

 

 

Test 3

With standard fan, insulation

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

343

340

360

330

Off time (sec)

223

220

220

230

Duty Cycle

61%

 

 

 

 

Test 4

Insulation, internal fan (near side of case, sucking in cool air)

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

233

220

240

240

Off time (sec)

250

250

250

250

Duty Cycle

48%

 

 

 

 

Test 5

Insulation, internal fan (near side of case, sucking in cool air) plus fan baffle

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

203

210

200

200

Off time (sec)

250

250

250

250

Duty Cycle

45%

 

 

 

 

Test 6

Insulation, small fan (80mm) bolted inside of case, blowing across radiator

  run 1 run 2 run 3

On time (sec)

170

170

170

170

Off time (sec)

270

270

270

270

Duty Cycle

39%

 

 

 

 


pictures

 

 

Original fan location Insulation-1
 

 

Insulation-2 Insulation-3
 

 

Insulation-4

New fan mounted on inside of outer casing, condenser side of motor compartment near top.

 

Thanks to Rod Egan